[Papyrus-L] Migration from Papyrus

Raisa Deber raisa.deber at utoronto.ca
Fri Apr 13 17:27:24 EDT 2007



On 13-Apr-07, at 11:37 AM, Christopher F. Martin wrote:


> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Raisa Deber wrote:

>

>> Since I have a non-Intel Mac, I can text extract from Word documents.

>

> Raisa,

>

> I am puzzled how how the Mac helps with this problem. I understood

> the Papyrus text-extract problem to arise from lack of

> compatibility with ever-newer versions of Word. Are you able to

> text extract because your (Mac) version of Word is older, or it is

> something intrinsic to the Mac environment?\

The Mac version of Papyrus (which runs under Classic) is newer than
the DOS one, and it does support new versions of Word. So I can take
material written by my team - whether in a Windows version or a Mac
one - and text extract it without problem. Unfortunately, Intel Macs
don't support Classic, so that may eventually pose a problem. But so
far, so good. And the Mac version of Papyrus will allow imports of
BB files from the DOS version, so we can still maintain our database
in the DOS/Windows version. Note that they can still write the
documents in Word, include the %% reference codes, etc. So as long
as I can text extract for them, we're fine.

Hope that helps.
Raisa


>

> Chris

>

>

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> Christopher F. Martin

> School of Medicine

> Center for Digestive Diseases & Nutrition

> CB# 7555, 4104 Bioinformatics Bldg.

> University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

> Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7555

> Phone: 919.966.9340 Fax: 919.966.7592

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

>

>

> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Raisa Deber wrote:

>

>> Actually, the opposite. We're hanging on to Papyrus because we

>> have a fairly large research group (including collaborators in

>> multiple locations, which means client-server approaches don't

>> work too well), and haven't found an alternative which allows us

>> to assign unique identification numbers to references. (Most

>> appear to do dynamic allocation). We have over 14,000 references

>> entered, have one master database (with a research assistant who

>> maintains it and posts revised bb files daily on the server), file

>> material (including electronic and hard copies) by their Papyrus

>> number, using a 'located' keyword to indicate where copies exist.

>> Since I have a non-Intel Mac, I can text extract from Word

>> documents. (Otherwise, one has to use WordPerfect, which I also

>> had to abandon for similar reasons, or downsave to Word 6/95

>> format.) So we tend to use the process of having a master copy of

>> articles (with Papyrus numbers) which is sent electronically to co-

>> authors by the first author. We ask collaborators to use track

>> changes, and the first author then makes the changes on the master

>> copy and I text extract it. Trying to work with a colleague using

>> EndNote was a nightmare, since we didn't have the references! We

>> had to enter everything into Papyrus and start it from scratch.

>>

>> Indeed, we've started using the nomenclature of "wiki" to indicate

>> that we're hoping our researchers will suggest entries,

>> corrections, keywords, etc. We're also allowing people to tag

>> their references (with a researcher- set of keywords) in the

>> master Papyrus data base, which they then can export to their own

>> reference managers, if they'd like.

>> So - which if any of the alternatives allow fixed identification

>> numbers? And are useable for both Mac and PC?

>> Raisa Deber

>> On 13-Apr-07, at 7:12 AM, Rodgers, John R. wrote:

>>

>>> Richard's comments point up a difficulty for those of us who co-

>>> author or otherwise shared e-texts. This is the same problem

>>> that made me give up WordPerfect- no one else in my circle uses

>>> it. Searching using Endnote is a problem for me because I have a

>>> very large database, but it is no problem for the students I

>>> teach who for the most part have small databases. Similarly, when

>>> I co-author I need to use a common reference managing program. I

>>> imagine that many of those who have managed to hang on to using

>>> Papyrus are sole authors.?

>>> John R. Rodgers, Ph.D.

>>> Department of Immunology

>>> Baylor College of Medicine

>>> Houston, Texas 77030

>>> 713-798-3903

>>> fax: 713-798-3700

>>> Personally I use Emacs both for writing the documents and for

>>> manipulating the BibTeX files but there are Java based programs that

>>> will do it.

>>> Of course, it does require learning LaTeX, but its much better than

>>> using Word anyway, IMHO

>>> --

>>> --

>>> Richard Fieldsend

>>> _______________________________________________

>>> _______________________________________________

>>> Papyrus-L mailing list

>>> Papyrus-L at ResearchSoftwareDesign.com

>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-l

>>

>> Raisa Deber, PhD

>> Professor, Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation

>> Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto

>> Director, M-THAC (From Medicare to Home and Community) Research

>> Unit (www.m-thac.org)

>> Health Sciences Building

>> 155 College Street Suite 425

>> Toronto, ON M5T 3M6

>> phone: (416) 978-8366

>> fax: (416) 978-7350

>> e-mail: raisa.deber at utoronto.ca

>>

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> Papyrus-L mailing list

>> Papyrus-L at ResearchSoftwareDesign.com

>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-l

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Papyrus-L mailing list

> Papyrus-L at ResearchSoftwareDesign.com

> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-l


Raisa Deber, PhD
Professor, Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
Director, M-THAC (From Medicare to Home and Community) Research Unit
(www.m-thac.org)
Health Sciences Building
155 College Street Suite 425
Toronto, ON M5T 3M6
phone: (416) 978-8366
fax: (416) 978-7350
e-mail: raisa.deber at utoronto.ca




More information about the Papyrus-L mailing list