[NHRC-user] NHRC-5
Jeff Otterson
jeff at nhrc.net
Fri Jul 13 20:01:00 EDT 2007
Hi,
There is no port priority in NHRC-5. We did not think anyone was using
that feature and did not implement it in NHRC-5.
Jeff
At 01:16 PM 7/12/2007, you wrote:
>Yes Jeff, we still have a problem with the link receiver audio not being
>muted when the main repeater is active. We are running the controller in
>"transmit" mode which from the NHRC-5 manual states "
>Set Link Port Transmit
>
>Mode
>
>When enabled (1), configures the link port into
>
>"Transmit Mode." In this mode, the link receive
>
>audio is transmitted over the main repeater, and
>
>the main repeater's receive audio is transmitted
>
>over the link.
>
>During this operaton what appears to be happening is the link receiver
>audio is not being muted when the Main repeater CAS is active. Therefore
>we need to know how the NHRC-5 accomplishes this in "Transmit mode.
>Ie....what would be the correct group switches to set or not set to
>achieve transmit mode with the NHRC-5. Perhaps we have an incorrect switch
>set or not set in one of the other groups?
>
>Note that we a using 4 Phoenix Radios in our setup. 1 radio as XMIT and 1
>radio as RCV for the main repeater. 1 Radio as XMIT and 1 Radio as RCV for
>the link Repeater. Also they are wired as per the instructions on pages 6
>& 7 of the NHRC-5 Manual. The firmware version in the controller chip is
>1.03. Perhaps the chip in the controller is malfunctioning in which case a
>replacement would be needed.
>
>In summary we need to be able to operate in the equivilent of "Transmit
>Mode" One receiver audio being muted depending on
>which way the traffic is moving. ie from the main repeater thru the link,
>or the opposite, from the link receive thru the main repeater.
>
>I hope there is enough info for you to assist in straightning us out here
>Jeff. If not then perhaps you could supply a phone number and time you
>couold be reached.
>
>Thanks Jeff..!!
>
>P.S. We also use an NHRC 4 controller,version 1.03 in another system. It
>states in the NHRC-4 manual group 3 switches that there is a switch
>provision to set Port priority....In the NHRC-5 the same switch says the
>switch is for CTCSS all quite confusing in the book of words.
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Otterson" <jeff at nhrc.net>
>To: "NHRC User Community Mailing List" <nhrc-user at nhrc.net>
>Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 9:05 PM
>Subject: Re: [NHRC-user] NHRC-5
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Is your problem fixed, or do you still need help?
>>
>>Jeff
>>
>>At 09:59 PM 6/19/2007, you wrote:
>>>Yes it seems to be a feedback..as I discribed previously. To avoid this
>>>I am told when using the NHRC 4 controller the main repeater port must
>>>have priority over the link port. In this case, using the NHRC 5
>>>controller. There is no apparent method of designating port priority. I
>>>would appear that this has been taken care of by the design of the
>>>controller board.
>>>Thanks for the reply Jeff..!!
>>>
>>>
>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Otterson" <jeff at nhrc.net>
>>>To: "NHRC User Community Mailing List" <nhrc-user at nhrc.net>
>>>Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 8:24 PM
>>>Subject: Re: [NHRC-user] NHRC-5
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Squealing?"
>>>>
>>>>Do you mean feedback?
>>>>
>>>>Jeff
>>>>
>>>>At 02:13 PM 6/19/2007, you wrote:
>>>>> Recently I have purchased an NHRC_5 controller from NHRC.
>>>>> From past experience using NHRC-4 controllers it has been noted that
>>>>> the main repeater has to have priority over the link port . This
>>>>> function is done when setting the nhrc-4 controller up on its initial
>>>>> install. Upon installing the new NHRC-5 controller on a linked
>>>>> repeater on our system we are experiencing severe squeeling or
>>>>> feedback similar to that which would occur with the NHRC-4 controller
>>>>> if the main repeater port Has not been given priority. There is no
>>>>> reference to port priority in the the NHRC-5 manual so we have
>>>>> assumed that the new logic of the board takes care of any port
>>>>> priority issues. Can anyone shed some light on this subject. It
>>>>> should be noted that all cavities and related items have been
>>>>> rechecked with an IRF scope and all seems to be in order.
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks so much for time an help folks.
>>>>>
>>>>>John ..VE3OAX
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>NHRC-user mailing list
>>>>>NHRC-user at nhrc.net
>>>>>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/nhrc-user
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>NHRC-user mailing list
>>>>NHRC-user at nhrc.net
>>>>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/nhrc-user
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database:
>>>>269.9.0/853 - Release Date: 6/18/2007 3:02 PM
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>NHRC-user mailing list
>>>NHRC-user at nhrc.net
>>>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/nhrc-user
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>NHRC-user mailing list
>>NHRC-user at nhrc.net
>>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/nhrc-user
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database:
>>269.9.0/853 - Release Date: 6/18/2007 3:02 PM
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>NHRC-user mailing list
>NHRC-user at nhrc.net
>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/nhrc-user
More information about the NHRC-user
mailing list