[Coco] Coco 1 vs Coco 2 software compatibility

Bill Pierce ooogalapasooo at aol.com
Wed May 24 13:18:01 EDT 2017


There's a difference in the bitbanger. That's the reason there's Coco1 and Coco2 versions of HDBDOS and NitrOS9 with Drivewire. Due to differences in the chip, the Coco 1 can't do the baud rates that the Coco2 can.
I'm not sure what the exact differences are, but others will probably elaborate.
Also, earlier models of the Coco 1 didn't handle the 64k upgrade well. I think the "F" board (the last Coco 1?) was the first Coco 1 "officially" setup for the 64k upgrade (I may be wrong on this one).

 

 

Bill Pierce
"Charlie stole the handle, and the train it won't stop going, no way to slow down!" - Ian Anderson - Jethro Tull

My Music from the Tandy/Radio Shack Color Computer 2 & 3
https://sites.google.com/site/dabarnstudio/
Co-Contributor, Co-Editor for CocoPedia
http://www.cocopedia.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

E-Mail: ooogalapasooo at aol.com

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Klein <ron at kdomain.org>
To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts <coco at maltedmedia.com>
Sent: Wed, May 24, 2017 12:00 pm
Subject: [Coco] Coco 1 vs Coco 2 software compatibility

Hello everyone,Does anyone know of any _significant_ software incompatibilities between a64K (Disk) Extended Color Basic Coco 1 and a 64K (Disk) Extended ColorBasic Coco 2?  Not looking for anything related to OS9/NitrOS9.  The onlything I can think of is perhaps any software written to take advantage ofthe "T1" based video chip in some Coco 2's for lowercase.  I do realizethere are many hardware differences, but focused on software for now.Thanks!-Ron-- Coco mailing listCoco at maltedmedia.comhttps://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco


More information about the Coco mailing list