[Coco] Including an SSC

[S Klammer]

With all due respect Al, I would tend to disagree with 1, 3 and 4.  As for
2, how many months has in been since Darren's last production run and this
one - which has materialized in a matter of days?

It is now a moot point.  Those who suggested some additional ideas, like
adding a SSC or even just an onboard expansion port will have to look
elsewhere... oh well, we tried.

Nick, in terms of connections... I wonder if the cassette port might be
utilized?  Like the X10 module.  In this way there would be no tinkering
involved, no Multi-pak needed and the audio feed into the coco is there.

Shain
On Oct 11, 2014 4:24 PM, "Al Hartman" <alhartman6 at optonline.net> wrote:

> It's not as easy as just saying "Yes, let's do it."
>
> 1. It won't fit in an FD-502 case
> 2. It will take a month, possibly two to develop a prototype, create board
> artwork, create prototypes of that, and test it all.
> 3. A lot of us don't want an SSC in a CocoSDC. They are not related in
> usage or need.
> 4. A lot of us already own an SSC (I do), have never used it, and don't
> want another.
>
> -[ Al ]-
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Simon Jonassen
> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 2:29 PM
> To: 'CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts'
> Subject: Re: [Coco] Including an SSC
>
> WHY NOT include SSC.....
>
> Then maybe we could have what we have been missing all these years....
>
> Anyone who doubts the AY chip:
>
> http://ay-riders.speccy.cz/
>
> /Simon :-)
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>