[Coco] News gateways (was Test)

[tim lindner]

John E. Malmberg <wb8tyw at qsl.net> wrote:

> I would vote against comp.sys.tandy.  It has too much stuff that is not
> related to the COCO.

But that was my point. The Powers That Be won't create
comp.sys.tandy.coco until a need is shown.

So until bit.listserve.coco is shut down, _and_ the Color Computer
traffic increases in comp.sys.tandy we won't get our own group.

I believe comp.sys.6809 would be the wrong group to target for
expansion.

-- 
tim lindner
tlindner at ix.netcom.com                                        Bright