[Papyrus-L] (no subject)

[Hugh Gunz]

Perhaps not a bad time to review the experience that many of us have had 
since what I suspect may have been a mass tear-stained emigration when Dave 
was finally able to announce the details of Papyrus's future.

Reference Manager and the others in the ISI stable were certainly talked 
about a lot. I went for Biblioscape, and it's turned out to be a good 
decision. Aside from being pretty fully-featured (they all have their good 
and bad points), its real strength from my point of view is the way it 
makes databases intra- or Internet-accessible so I can get at and edit my 
references from anywhere. That also makes it very good for teams of 
researchers. The developers are extremely responsive to suggestions for 
improvement, too.

Hugh Gunz
University of Toronto

At 12:59 2002-07-31 -0500, you wrote:

>Dear Fellow Papyrus Users,
>
>I currently have over 13,000 references in Papyrus, but am thinking of
>moving to a Window's-based platform. I am wondering if anyone has had
>problems in moving Papyrus references to one of the popular
>Window's-based programs such as Reference Manager?  Is this move
>possible, difficult, easy, etc. Thanks for your input.
>
>Howard
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Papyrus-L mailing list
>Papyrus-L at ResearchSoftwareDesign.com
>http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-l