[Coco] Back to os9level 2

phil pt ptaylor2446 at gmail.com
Tue Apr 28 09:22:57 EDT 2020


'The correct format is yyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 8:58 AM Alex Evans <varmfskii at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure what you want to patch the clock to do. The way I see it
> is that you can wither leave the clock alone and patch the utilities
> that misinterpret the system time, or patch the utilities that
> misinterpret the system time. Now, the matter is different when you
> start talking about dealing with modules that support hardware RTCs.
> Look at it this way, the current clock module (60Hz, but I assume 50Hz
> is the same) will roll over from 99-12-31 to 100-01-01 and would store
> the current year as 120 (the epoch is 1900). What do you think the
> system should store the current year as, and how do you intend to
> manage this by only patching the clock module?
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 8:57 PM phil pt <ptaylor2446 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think the best way to resolve this issue is to patch the clock on the
> old
> > Os9 Level 2 and use that. This way I do not have to make several hundred
> > lines of changes in the code.
> >
> > <
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon
> >
> > Virus-free.
> > www.avast.com
> > <
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link
> >
> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 10:34 PM Bill Nobel <b_nobel at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Well to tell the truth the only place that exists nowadays is in the
> > > original code.  Over time Clock got split between to modules. First
> being
> > > the base, then the second became hardware specific for each type.  I’ve
> > > been getting it put back to one for the level3 mods from Allan DeKok.
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPad
> > >
> > > > On Apr 26, 2020, at 12:29 PM, phil pt <ptaylor2446 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Is there any patch to the clock on the old os9 level 2 so the date
> would
> > > > work as yyyy/mm/dd Hr:mm:ss?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > <
> > >
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon
> > > >
> > > > Virus-free.
> > > > www.avast.com
> > > > <
> > >
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link
> > > >
> > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Coco mailing list
> > > > Coco at maltedmedia.com
> > > > https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> > >
> > > --
> > > Coco mailing list
> > > Coco at maltedmedia.com
> > > https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Coco mailing list
> > Coco at maltedmedia.com
> > https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>


More information about the Coco mailing list