[Coco] [SPAM] Re: Multipak redesign/replacement / New CoCo...

[Zippster]

Must be.  

I’d like to see it if it’s been put up somewhere in a somewhat organized format.

- Ed



> On Feb 23, 2015, at 11:16 AM, Steve Batson <steve at batsonphotography.com> wrote:
> 
> As good as the CC3 emulators work, some Reverse Engineering must have been about its Behavior, surprised some of that info isn't out there, or is it?
> 
> Steve Batson
> Batson Photography
> "Today's Special Moments, Tomorrow's Priceless Treasures"
> 
> Website: http://www.batsonphotography.com
> Blog: http://www.batsonphotography.com/blog
> Our Free Photography Site and Forum: http://www.digitalphotographerzone.com
> 
>> On Feb 23, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Zippster <zippster278 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I would love to do this, and probably will give it a try with a CoCo2 replacement once I wrap up
>> a couple other projects, as it looks fairly straightforward.
>> 
>> With the CoCo3 the problem would be decent documentation on the GIME.
>> From what I understand, it will have to be reverse-engineered based on behavior.
>> 
>> - Ed
>> 
>> 
>>> On Feb 23, 2015, at 10:52 AM, Steve Batson <steve at batsonphotography.com> wrote:
>>> 
>> 
>> <snip>
>> 
>>> Wouldn't it make more
>>> sense to focus on creating a new Fully CoCo 2/3 Compatible Motherboard 
>> 
>> <snip>
>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Coco mailing list
>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Coco mailing list
>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> 
> 
> -- 
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco