[Coco] Homebrew CoCo Games
RETRO Innovations
go4retro at go4retro.com
Sat Dec 12 00:38:24 EST 2015
On 12/11/2015 11:20 PM, Nick Marentes wrote:
>
>
> I was thinking more of a SN76489 which is essentially a smaller
> version of the GI chip minus the I/O.
>
> My "vision" for a SuperRom Pac is a bit more conservative.
>
> I basically just see it as a 64K Eprom with software selectable 8K
> banks mapped to the CoCo and a SN76489 chip interfaced for sound.
>
> The board would be as low cost and simple as possible wih the sound
> chip available as an option.
>
> The goal is to have a PCB that could be put into the ROM pak cart that
> a software developer could buirn/write his game to with the option to
> support hardware sound if they wish.
>
> The key is to encourage software development for the CoCo again by
> providing a reliable, economical and secure way of distributing their
> code.
>
> That's my take on it but the general audience may have a different view.
That view is fine, but I ran the numbers and the 512kB board with the
smaller CPLD is literally the cheapest you can make such a board. I
mean, you can design for a smaller FLASH ROM, but you're going to pay
The smallest ROM you can buy that will work is $1.00/piece, and for that
price, you can get 512kB. You won't find a CPLD for less than $1.00,
and you can't build the circuit with discrete TTL for less than $1.00.
If you only do an EPROM, you can get by with 2 ICs like the SuperROM
Pack ($1.00), but if you do EEPROM or FLASH, you're looking at a bit
more logic to create the WRITE signal and gate it so it does not
interfere with RAM mode. I'd say $2.00 to do that. At either point, a
CPLD is cheaper and far more capable.
So, I'm not proposing the size because it is bigger, it's just not any
cheaper to go smaller (unless you can find a stash of really cheap NOS).
I'll check out the SN IC, though.
Jim
More information about the Coco
mailing list