[Coco] 6809 compilers

[Kandur]

Wednesday, August 6, 2014, 7:40:53 PM, you wrote:
> I don't currently have a windows system to test with. I don't think the 
> resulting binaries still require the mingw system to run. They should 
> only depend on the standard C library which you probably already have. 

This is good news.
> You certainly need mingw and msys to compile lwtools but if you obtain a 
> contributed binary, what it requires will depend on how it was compiled. 
> Tormod's contributed binaries were built with mingw.

The bad news is, I can't download those binaries:
http://lwtools.projects.l-w.ca/contrib/tormod/ 
> By the way, the source files you linked to will probably require a bit 
> of tweaking to assemble with lwasm. Notably, lwasm does not ship with an 
> os9defs file so you'll have to acquire an appropriate one from somewhere. 

That sould be no problem.
> It does, however, support building OS9 modules.

That is great.
However, my code contains several lines like this:

 ifp1
 use /h0/defs/os9defs
 use /h0/defs/scfdefs
 endc

Can I just simply delete them, because these in LWASM 
could lead to unintentional problems and phasing errors?

Kandur


> On 14-08-06 08:02 PM, Kandur wrote:
>> Thank you William,
>> It appears, that the mingw and the basic msys system
>> has to be installed in order to be able to use lwtools.
>> Am I correct?
>> Looks like it is a very well written and maintained product.
>> (2014-04-11: LWTOOLS 4.10)

>> Kandur

>> Wednesday, August 6, 2014, 5:05:10 PM, you wrote:
>>> In addition to others mentioned, you might also consider lwtools. It doesn't
>>> have a gui but it does work on Windows. It doesn't compile c or anything like
>>> that but it does support  assembling to object files and then linking.

>>> Lwtools is at http://lwtools.projects.l-w.ca



>>> -------- Original message --------
>>> From: Kandur <k at qdv.pw>
>>> Date: 2014-08-06  17:07  (GMT-07:00)
>>> To: coco at maltedmedia.com
>>> Subject: [Coco] 6809 compilers

>>> In the very early 80s, I used the Micro Works SDS80C
>>> editor + assembler + monitor cartridge, to assemble 6809 binaries.
>>> I still have this cartridge: http://qdv.pw/coco/?p=213
>>> Surely in 2014 must be a better way to compile sources
>>> on a powerful windows machine. Any suggestions?
>>> Thanks.

>>> Kandur

>>> --
>>> Coco mailing list
>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco