[Coco] backups and stuff was Re: basic09 - append to file

gene heskett gheskett at wdtv.com
Fri Jan 14 19:03:03 EST 2011


On Friday, January 14, 2011 06:54:44 pm Willard Goosey did opine:

> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:42:13PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> > Yes, finished early this morning and a -t run on it, seems good.  By
> > not having all those FD sectors in the backup, just the files, it
> > actually shrank a somewhat surprising amount, to just over 88
> > megabytes.  And used only 15 of the possible 48 fd.seg entries.
> 
> Good, good.  Let's see, you said the drive you were backing up had
> 140M on it?
I was guessing, the numbers you get from a free /device need massaging to 
make human readable decimal numbers and I was using pure SWAG's. ;-)

> Heck, that's 37% compression without even compressing any
> data!  I'm impressed both with OS-9 and bru all over again because
> that actually worked.

That compression is because there are lots of files that consist of the fd 
sector, and less than a sector of data.  bru compresses the fd sectors 
away, only storing the file, with a min allocation of one sector IIRC.
 
> > True, and that of course it has no knowledge of at any point till it
> > finally hits the EOF of the root directory with no children still
> > running.
> 
> I never really liked that pre-allocation idea anyway.  It seems like
> it's sort of a cop-out.

Always did to me too.  OTOH, leaving the sas set to some huge number 
doesn't really waste a lot of disk space because its all corrected to be 
just what the file occupies when the closing code is executed.
 
> > I probably have 20% of rtsi 6x09 tree here, and could help restore it.
> > Between the bunch of us I think we could do a decent job of restoring
> > the 6x09 tree at least.
> 
> We seem to have learned from experience, there's plenty of CD-ROM's of
> RTSI around.  Presumably Roger Taylor's DVD has images of both RTSI
> and maltedmedia.

But after the crash, or the rooting as the case may be, his site was rooted 
once too.
 
> >One thing is for sure, I would get rid of some of my
> > less than stellar earlier versions of some of my utilities.  One keeps
> > on developing useful stuff, bug fixing etc, and there are early
> > versions of some of my stuff out there that shouldn't ever see the
> > light of day again if lost.
> 
> How do you handle that?  do you use some sort of RCS?
> 
Emails to Allen B., occasionally they work. ;(

> > Here, a lot of it is just because I took something apart to see how it
> > worked, maybe even made my local copy better, but never had the heart
> > to nuke it once I was finished, emphasizing that old saw that says "a
> > program is never truly finished until someone shoots the programmer."
> > ;-)
> 
> "He died at the console, of hunger and thirst.
>  Next day they buried him, face down, 9-edge first."

Sounds about right, and if I don't go light a fire under some pork chops, 
me & the missus are gonna starve. ;-) Later.

> Willard


-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The rule is, jam to-morrow and jam yesterday, but never jam today.
		-- Lewis Carroll



More information about the Coco mailing list