[Coco] This tickles me....
boisy at tee-boy.com
Fri Oct 24 23:40:29 EDT 2008
On Oct 24, 2008, at 7:53 PM, Chuck Youse wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 21:54 -0500, George Ramsower wrote:
>> I'm fairly sure this stuff wouldn't happen as often if we could
>> keep the
>> subjects in line with the directive of this list group.
> Actually, when I do bring up things that are on-topic - usually me
> asking detailed questions about NitrOS-9 - they're more often than not
> ignored. I don't know if it's because no one knows the answers, or if
> those in the know don't care to respond. I'm still waiting for any
> insight as to why V.PAGE isn't used in the Coco version of OS-9, and
> anyone thinks it's unwise to appropriate it for Multi-Pak slot
> information. Funny how Boisy, King of NitrOS-9 Hill, only seems to
> up to turn on that Cajun charm and call for my ejection from the list
> (Jesus would have done the same, I'm sure), or defend one of his
Hey Chuck, I see you're still taking pot shots. You have a real chip
on your shoulder about anything related to Christianity or Republicans.
Don't deviate. Stay on topic.
> I was just beginning to inventory my Coco crap to either off-load on
> e-bay or chuck (I'm proud that my nickname is a common slang term, I
> think only guys named Richard really have me beat on that one). I've
> got tons of Coco crap in my lab and in my tiny midtown apartment -
> seems that the Coco has become a gigantic waste of space and time, and
> the remnants of the Coco community just aren't all that dynamic any
> more. There remains much interesting work that can be done with our
> 8-bit buddy, especially on the NitrOS-9 side in terms of
> clean-up, and even "Coco 4" type development, just for pure hack
> But sadly there is only a very small audience for such things. The
> greatest base seems to be people playing games in emulators, which is
I have to agree with you on this. Despite your asinine posting
behavior, you do ask some of the most detailed technical questions of
anyone on this list.
V.PAGE... I don't have any particular insight as to why it seems to be
ignored in NitrOS-9. I suspect it's part of the same philosophy that
Microware had with OS-9 Level One's floppy driver which didn't take
advantage of double-sided drives: hard-code to the common case to save
space and make things work faster, etc.
More information about the Coco