[Coco] Why do we need a CoCo 4? (Long irrelevant rant)

[jdaggett at gate.net]

On 29 Dec 2008 at 12:20, John Eric wrote:

> sort of like what was done with the 65c816 a 16-bit compatible with
> the 8-bit 65c02?
> 
> 
Probably would be better to do something like what the HC11/HC12 
approach. Then again if the HC12 had a U register then this thread would 
be mute. A Coco4 would better be done with an HC12. 

james