[Coco] Question re: C Compiler sources

[Boisy Pitre]

Steve,

By the looks of it, L01a6 ends is bogus.  Ends simply marks the end of  
a segment, and I would eliminate the label on that line.

Sounds like you're making progress.

Boisy

On Dec 28, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Steven Hirsch wrote:

> Boisy,
>
> I started hacking my way through a build of the C Compiler sources  
> and am running into one oddity.  There are a number of disassembled  
> files for the runtime library that have this type of situation at  
> the end:
>
> ....
>
> bra   L01a6
> L0197 ldd   8,s
> L0199 pshs  d
> ldd   8,s
> pshs  d
> pshs  u
> L01a1 lbsr  L0027
> leas  6,s
> L01a6 puls  u,pc
>
> L01a6 ends
>
> The rma assembler is complaining about multiply-defined labels,  
> which would appear to be a correct assessment.  What's your sense  
> about the intended syntax?  I'm guessing that the second occurance  
> of L01a6 is bogus, but you are far more familiar with the lay of the  
> land here.
>
> FYI for anyone else who wants to dip in:  The provided Makefiles are  
> probably intended for use with an older or non-standard version of  
> 'rma'. For example, in the library subdirectory it tries to do this:
>
> rma prof.a -o prof.r
>
> which is not correct for the current version in toolshed.  By  
> reading the sources (couldn't find any documentation), it appears  
> that this is actually correct:
>
> rma prof.a -O=prof.r
>
> The Makefiles have other problems that I'll try to post about as I  
> correct them.
>
> Steve
>
>
> -- 
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco

Regards,
Boisy G. Pitre
--
Tee-Boy
Mobile: 337.781.3570
Email: boisy at tee-boy.com
Web: http://www.tee-boy.com