[Coco] AT306 Mouse and Keyboard

[Dave Kelly]

Paul Fitch wrote:

> Seeing as how this chip was new in the early '90s, it doesn't make sence to
> me that you would have a 100 year clock that wasn't Y2K compliant.  SO maybe
> the SETIME command is whats broken here?  Nah, that doesn't make sence.  Its
> something in the KERNAL, since that's where the error first pops up.  SETIME
> is still broken tho, its just not the cause.  It's a symptom.

OS9 was not Y2K compliant until version 3.1.  Microware did a work 
around 2.4 but it was not released to the public domain.

-- 
A little rum in the morning coffee. Just to clear the cobwebs, ya know.