[Coco] replacing main rom

jdaggett at gate.net jdaggett at gate.net
Fri May 13 16:34:06 EDT 2005


Art

we are talking about the same thing from different perspective. 

What I am saying is that the "apparant" blink rate and not the actual 
blink rate. Due to the persistance, only about every 10th blink is 
seen on the screen. The phosphur cannot change fast enough to 
see the change in every field of the raster scan. 

james


On 13 May 2005 at 14:09, Arthur Flexser wrote:

Date sent:      	Fri, 13 May 2005 14:09:17 -0400 (EDT)
From:           	Arthur Flexser <flexser at fiu.edu>
To:             	CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts 
<coco at maltedmedia.com>
Subject:        	Re: [Coco] replacing main rom
Send reply to:  	CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts 
<coco at maltedmedia.com>
	<mailto:coco-
request at maltedmedia.com?subject=unsubscribe>
	<mailto:coco-
request at maltedmedia.com?subject=subscribe>

> I disagree.  Putting it in other terms, the persistence should
> decrease the amplitude of the variation in luminance, without
> affecting its frequency.
> 
> Art
> 





More information about the Coco mailing list