[Coco] bit.listserv VS. these moderated lists

[jdaggett at gate.net]

Actually I spend a bit of time on both. Since my NNTP server gets 
the bit.listserve.coco,  I have no problem with both.

james


On 21 Mar 2005 at 20:22, Mannequin* wrote:

Date sent:      	Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:22:23 -0600
From:           	Mannequin* <mannslists at invigorated.org>
To:             	cocomedia <coco at maltedmedia.com>
Subject:        	[Coco] bit.listserv VS. these moderated lists
Send reply to:  	CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts 
<coco at maltedmedia.com>
	<mailto:coco-
request at maltedmedia.com?subject=unsubscribe>
	<mailto:coco-
request at maltedmedia.com?subject=subscribe>

> Okay, let's lay the facts down on the table:
> 
>  - Boisy Pitre wants to go back to bit.listserv.coco.
>  - James Dessart doesn't.
> 
> Have I missed anything else here?
> 
> I've just waded through about 70 posts arguing the case for and
> against moving back. It just comes down to this:
> 
> If you want to go back, go back. If you don't, stay here.
> 
> BUT, no matter what, we are being divided!
> 
> Right now, we are divided over whether to go or stay. If people go, we
> will be divided because there are alot of people who don't want to go
> back.
> 
> It's something to think about if the general idea behind this is
> community...
> 
> -M.
> 
> -- 
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco