[Coco] Re: Is this a discussion about a new Coco?

[jdaggett at gate.net]

John

Gumstix size is not bad. Definitely require a different MPU/CPU. I 
am not so sure that many of the Coco Community right now is 
willing to depart the beloved 6809/6309.

james


On 17 Apr 2005 at 20:00, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:

Subject:        	Re: [Coco] Re: Is this a discussion about a 
new Coco?
From:           	"John R. Hogerhuis" <jhoger at pobox.com>
To:             	CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts 
<coco at maltedmedia.com>
Organization:   	Speaker To Machines, Inc.
Date sent:      	Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:00:49 -0700
Send reply to:  	jhoger at pobox.com,
	CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts 
<coco at maltedmedia.com>
	<mailto:coco-
request at maltedmedia.com?subject=unsubscribe>
	<mailto:coco-
request at maltedmedia.com?subject=subscribe>

> So if you made the coco4 portable and meet these requirements might
> unify our two camps into a juggernaut like the world has never seen
> :-)
> 
> Current ideas are a ARM cpu, ez80, or rabbit. If ARM could prototype
> using the Gumstix embedded computers and a T102 case.