[Coco] Barden Book

[Kenneth Schunk]

I'm not clear how useful that provision would be. If it just obligates
the copyright holder to provide a license, but doesn't specify any
terms, what's to stop the holder to set license terms that effectivly
deny the license. Say, for example, royalities of $500 per book sold -
clearly nobody would want a license at those terms.

On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:01:20 -0400, James Dessart <james at skwirl.ca> wrote:
> 
> On 7-Jul-04, at 12:47 PM, Roger Taylor wrote:
> 
> > That part, I'm not quite following.  He's obligated to give you a
> > license?
> 
> I'm looking through the act now, and I'm not certain that the provision
> is still there. It's been a while since I saw the provision, and it may
> have been repealed since.
> 
> James
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>