[Coco] 6502->6809

[Bill Gunshannon]

Always seemed like it to me.

bill

________________________________________
From: Coco [coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com] on behalf of Mark McDougall [msmcdoug at iinet.net.au]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 8:57 AM
To: coco at maltedmedia.com
Subject: Re: [Coco] 6502->6809

On 18/07/2017 8:26 PM, Carlos Camacho wrote:

> inferior cpu to superior cpu was doable
>
> superior cpu to inferior cpu was a big pain in the neck (requiring much
> more code and sacrifices of chickens)

In this case, 6502->6809 is certainly doable, whether or not it's an
example of the former case.

Regards,

--
Mark McDougall
<http://retroports.blogspot.com.au>

--
Coco mailing list
Coco at maltedmedia.com
https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco