[Coco] 6502->6809

Mark McDougall msmcdoug at iinet.net.au
Tue Jul 18 08:57:42 EDT 2017


On 18/07/2017 8:26 PM, Carlos Camacho wrote:

> inferior cpu to superior cpu was doable
> 
> superior cpu to inferior cpu was a big pain in the neck (requiring much
> more code and sacrifices of chickens)

In this case, 6502->6809 is certainly doable, whether or not it's an 
example of the former case.

Regards,

-- 
Mark McDougall
<http://retroports.blogspot.com.au>


More information about the Coco mailing list