[Coco] ?PEEK(&HFF90) RETURNS 126 ON MY UNUPGRADED 26-3124?

[coco at yourdvd.net]

okay - thanks :-)

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Coco] ?PEEK(&HFF90) RETURNS 126 ON MY UNUPGRADED 26-3124?
> From: Mark Marlette <mark at cloud9tech.com>
> Date: Mon, April 23, 2007 4:32 am
> To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> 
> Rob, Sent an Email last Thursday. Your order shipped then. Thanks,
> Mark At 4/23/2007 12:43 AM, you wrote: >No, I didn't use the same
> CoCo. When I just received the 3124, the coco >3 i had tested the
> 3024,s with was in the storage building (i am >finishing up my new
> residence and the entire home i am living in now >will be one big coco
> playroom - after i tear out the partitions, and >shelve every wall :-)
> The coco i tested the 3124 with was one of the >later model coco 3's
> that came in the spiffy blue box rather than the >red lettered box.
> The 3124's tamper proof seal had been peeled off and >stuck beside the
> screw it once covered so i thought it was upgraded, >but upon opening
> it there were no apparent mods. I am sure tandy never >produced a coco
> 3 compatible mpi, only upgraded existing ones, which >really wouldn't
> be evident on the 3024's, but the 3124 should have had >a sat board or
> piggybacked chip if it had been upgraded. I will test it >with another
> coco 3 tomorrow. > >I have sent the money for an upgrade pal for a
> 3024 via paypal. The >reason I asked you if it had cleared was because
> I USED THE WRONG >ROUTING NUMBER. I checked with paypal and they paid
> it anyway and took >it from one of my credit cards, thankfully (I was
> worried you might >think I was trying to scam ya') :-) > >Thanks for
> all the wonderful work that you do - rob > > > -------- Original
> Message -------- > > Subject: Re: [Coco] ?PEEK(&HFF90) RETURNS 126 ON
> MY UNUPGRADED 26-3124? > > From: Mark Marlette  > > Date: Sun, April
> 22, 2007 6:53 pm > > To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts  > >
> > > Robert, What GIME is in your CoCo? Test performed on the same
> CoCo? > > I'm sure I have done this test on both MPIs. Been too long
> ago. > > Thanks, Mark At 4/21/2007 02:12 PM, you wrote: >Marks test of
> > > ?peek(&hff90) returns 255 on all of my 3024 multi-paks, >however
> it > > returned 126 on my 3124. I opened the 3124 and there is no
> >satellite > > board nor any piggy backed chips nor any mod of any
> kind - i >can't > > see that this pak has been upgraded. Does this
> test only work for >the > > 3024's? thanks - Rob > >p.s. - Mark - has
> my paypal payment cleared > > for the pal chip 3024 >upgrade? thanks -
> robert > > >-- >Coco mailing > > list >Coco at maltedmedia.com > >
> >http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco > > > > >-- >No virus
> > > found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >
> >Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.5.9/773 - Release Date: > >
> >4/22/2007 8:18 PMNo virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked
> by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database:
> 269.5.9/773 - Release Date: > > 4/22/2007 8:18 PM-- Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com > >
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco > > >-- >Coco mailing
> list >Coco at maltedmedia.com
> >http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco > > > > >-- >No virus
> found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.5.9/773 - Release Date:
> >4/22/2007 8:18 PM<hr>No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.5.9/773 - Release Date:
> 4/22/2007 8:18 PM<hr>-- Coco mailing list Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco