[Coco] ?PEEK(&HFF90) RETURNS 126 ON MY UNUPGRADED 26-3124?

[coco at yourdvd.net]

yes, i just used it to see what it would return, but I opened the mpi
and it hasn't been upgraded. I have ordered a pal chip for my older
3024 from mark. when it arrives i'll upgrade one of my 3024's and keep
the 3124 on one of the coco2's
-r

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Coco] ?PEEK(&HFF90) RETURNS 126 ON MY UNUPGRADED 26-3124?
> From: Robert Gault <robert.gault at worldnet.att.net>
> Date: Mon, April 23, 2007 2:18 am
> To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> 
> Mark Marlette wrote: > Robert, > > What GIME is in your CoCo? > > Test
> performed on the same CoCo? > > I'm sure I have done this test on both
> MPIs. Been too long ago. > > Thanks, > > Mark > > At 4/21/2007 02:12
> PM, you wrote: > >> Marks test of ?peek(&hff90) returns 255 on all of
> my 3024 multi-paks, >> however it returned 126 on my 3124. I opened
> the 3124 and there is no >> satellite board nor any piggy backed chips
> nor any mod of any kind - i >> can't see that this pak has been
> upgraded. Does this test only work for >> the 3024's? thanks - Rob >>
> I just tried a test with a Coco3 and an MPI 3024. Without the MPI the
> PEEK returned 126 and the same with the MPI. What are you trying to
> determine with this PEEK, whether the MPI was upgraded for Coco3 use?
> -- Coco mailing list Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco