[NHRC-user] NHRC-5
Jeff Otterson
jeff at nhrc.net
Wed Jun 20 06:18:07 EDT 2007
There is no port priority logic in the NHRC-5.
Jeff
At 11:15 PM 6/19/2007, you wrote:
>At this moment the problem seems stable but it has seemingly been
>intermittened in the past so it may re-occur. Can you explain how the NHRC
>5 handles which port has priority?
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Otterson" <jeff at nhrc.net>
>To: "NHRC User Community Mailing List" <nhrc-user at nhrc.net>
>Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 9:05 PM
>Subject: Re: [NHRC-user] NHRC-5
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Is your problem fixed, or do you still need help?
>>
>>Jeff
>>
>>At 09:59 PM 6/19/2007, you wrote:
>>>Yes it seems to be a feedback..as I discribed previously. To avoid this
>>>I am told when using the NHRC 4 controller the main repeater port must
>>>have priority over the link port. In this case, using the NHRC 5
>>>controller. There is no apparent method of designating port priority. I
>>>would appear that this has been taken care of by the design of the
>>>controller board.
>>>Thanks for the reply Jeff..!!
>>>
>>>
>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Otterson" <jeff at nhrc.net>
>>>To: "NHRC User Community Mailing List" <nhrc-user at nhrc.net>
>>>Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 8:24 PM
>>>Subject: Re: [NHRC-user] NHRC-5
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Squealing?"
>>>>
>>>>Do you mean feedback?
>>>>
>>>>Jeff
>>>>
>>>>At 02:13 PM 6/19/2007, you wrote:
>>>>> Recently I have purchased an NHRC_5 controller from NHRC.
>>>>> From past experience using NHRC-4 controllers it has been noted that
>>>>> the main repeater has to have priority over the link port . This
>>>>> function is done when setting the nhrc-4 controller up on its initial
>>>>> install. Upon installing the new NHRC-5 controller on a linked
>>>>> repeater on our system we are experiencing severe squeeling or
>>>>> feedback similar to that which would occur with the NHRC-4 controller
>>>>> if the main repeater port Has not been given priority. There is no
>>>>> reference to port priority in the the NHRC-5 manual so we have
>>>>> assumed that the new logic of the board takes care of any port
>>>>> priority issues. Can anyone shed some light on this subject. It
>>>>> should be noted that all cavities and related items have been
>>>>> rechecked with an IRF scope and all seems to be in order.
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks so much for time an help folks.
>>>>>
>>>>>John ..VE3OAX
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>NHRC-user mailing list
>>>>>NHRC-user at nhrc.net
>>>>>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/nhrc-user
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>NHRC-user mailing list
>>>>NHRC-user at nhrc.net
>>>>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/nhrc-user
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database:
>>>>269.9.0/853 - Release Date: 6/18/2007 3:02 PM
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>NHRC-user mailing list
>>>NHRC-user at nhrc.net
>>>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/nhrc-user
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>NHRC-user mailing list
>>NHRC-user at nhrc.net
>>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/nhrc-user
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database:
>>269.9.0/853 - Release Date: 6/18/2007 3:02 PM
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>NHRC-user mailing list
>NHRC-user at nhrc.net
>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/nhrc-user
More information about the NHRC-user
mailing list