[Coco] Is it hopeless...
bill.gunshannon at hotmail.com
Tue Jan 28 06:55:41 EST 2020
On 1/28/20 1:03 AM, James Ross wrote:
> Stan Blazejewski wrote:
>> I shudder to think how long some of these messages
>> would have taken to download at 300 baud :-)
> Is 300 baud the same as 300 bps (bits per second)? In essence 30 bytes second? (8 bit data bytes 2 control bits)
> Was 300 baud the de-facto speed back when TTY meant some mechanical typing machine? Is that why it's so slow? Surely even the very first phone lines could carry a signal much faster that 300 bps?
Actually, teletypes were even slower. I think my old Lorenz LO-50
was 45 baud. And, other than communication it was also my first
printer driven through the cassette port on my TRS-80. My first
real dial-up terminal was a Portacom-110. And yes, the 110 was
the baudrate. My first 300 baud was a TI Silent-700.
More information about the Coco