[Coco] NitrOS9 and 6309 code

[Allen Huffman]

On May 31, 2019, at 10:05 PM, Gene Heskett <gheskett at shentel.net> wrote:
> 
> However, it is in fact a bad module header as the parity byte was not 
> corrected, the crc if it ever made it to that check, would be bad too.
> Besides, I think every error code over 200 available has already been 
> used.

If I try to run something and get Bad Module, I can ident the module and see it’s a 6309 or something else.

That actually sounds pretty good.