[Coco] Memory size of Coco 2
Bruce W. Calkins
brucewcalkins at charter.net
Mon Aug 13 07:59:40 EDT 2018
In the early days they expected to use "half-good" 64k chips for the 32k
upgrades. The cost savings of that did not pan out. The "F" board coco
1 was jumpered for all good 64k chips. The "D" and "E" boards had
jumpers for mapping the upper or lower banks for 32k. You needed to
wire in a gate on a 74LS02 to access both halves of the 64k chips.
On 08/13/2018 03:00 AM, L. Curtis Boyle wrote:
> The Coco 2, no. That was strictly 16K and 64K (and with or without Extended BASIC). The Coco 1 did, however, have a 32k option. (Even though it was usually a full 64K - which is why they later replaced it with an “official” 64k upgrade).
> L. Curtis Boyle
> curtisboyle at sasktel.net
>> On Aug 13, 2018, at 12:10 AM, Andrew <keeper63 at cox.net> wrote:
>> I'm going to defer to your expertise, since I was a kid when I had my CoCo 2. What I recall about it was that it came with 16K - but at some point I got an upgrade to 32K, then later again to 64K.
>> So the 32K was just an upgrade - they never sold it with that amount?
>> On 08/12/2018 10:16 PM, coco-request at maltedmedia.com wrote:
>>> Message: 4
>>> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2018 19:34:50 -0600
>>> From: "L. Curtis Boyle"<curtisboyle at sasktel.net>
>>> To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts<coco at maltedmedia.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [Coco] Memory size of Coco 2
>>> Message-ID:<8180C78D-8D67-43D8-81B4-91D0F030209D at sasktel.net>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>> The Coco 2 was only offered in 16K and 64k.
>> Andrew L. Ayers
>> Glendale, Arizona
>> Coco mailing list
>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
More information about the Coco