[Coco] Basic09 6309 version

[L. Curtis Boyle]

I did a quick test of integer MOD with the 6309 version on a real 6309 Coco. 
DIM c:integer
c=MOD(20,6)

This did return c=2, which is what it should do (20/6=3, remainder 2). So it looks like VCC is the problem.
It woudl be good if someone can try it in MAME, but I am pretty sure it works fine there too.


L. Curtis Boyle
curtisboyle at sasktel.net

TRS-80 Color Computer Games website
http://www.lcurtisboyle.com/nitros9/coco_game_list.html



> On May 25, 2017, at 11:54 AM, Wayne Campbell <asa.rand at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Oh, and I was still emulating the 6309 processor.
> 
> On May 25, 2017 10:53 AM, "Wayne Campbell" <asa.rand at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I put the 6809 version of B09 in the CMDS directory and ran a copy of the
>> JD procedure with no FLOAT() functions. It ran without errors and no
>> Hitting DIVQ_X error in VCC.
>> 
>> 
>> On May 25, 2017 2:17 AM, "Bill Pierce via Coco" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I did a search through the nitros9 sources and only found 6 references to
>>> "divq". 2 were in asm and disasm which were only references for the
>>> programs asm/disasm functionality and no actual running code, 2 were in 2
>>> of Boisy's test routines in one of his folders (not used for anything), and
>>> the other 2 were in basic09 and runb. So they are the only 2 nitros9
>>> modules that would rare their ugly heads on this.
>>> 
>>> I do remember some years ago when Joseph was developing VCC that there
>>> was some mention of something being missing in the 6309 core. I've searched
>>> but couldn't find where I saw it (it was loooong ago). I've even mentioned
>>> it in the issues on the VCC repo issues page. We may have found what it was.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Bill Pierce
>>> "Charlie stole the handle, and the train it won't stop going, no way to
>>> slow down!" - Ian Anderson - Jethro Tull
>>> 
>>> My Music from the Tandy/Radio Shack Color Computer 2 & 3
>>> https://sites.google.com/site/dabarnstudio/
>>> Co-Contributor, Co-Editor for CocoPedia
>>> http://www.cocopedia.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
>>> 
>>> E-Mail: ooogalapasooo at aol.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Walter Zambotti <zambotti at iinet.net.au>
>>> To: 'CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts' <coco at maltedmedia.com>
>>> Sent: Thu, May 25, 2017 3:31 am
>>> Subject: Re: [Coco] Basic09 6309 version
>>> 
>>>> This could explain the Hitting DIVQ_X error that VCC keeps complaining
>>> about.This error could be isolated to either VCC or BASIC09_6309.We can
>>> eliminate which one is the problem by running the BASIC09_6309 version on a
>>> real 6309 coco and not in VCC.  If the same problem persists then the
>>> problem in in BASIC09_6309.  If it does not persist then the problem is in
>>> VCC.I don't have a 6309 in my CoCo so I can't volunteer to help.Any takers
>>> out there?Walter-----Original Message-----From: Coco [mailto:
>>> coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com] On Behalf Of Wayne CampbellSent: Thursday,
>>> 25 May 2017 12:11 PMTo: CoCoList <coco at maltedmedia.com>Subject: Re:
>>> [Coco] Basic09 6309 versionThis could explain the Hitting DIVQ_X error that
>>> VCC keeps complaining about.On May 24, 2017 8:52 PM, "William Astle" <
>>> lost at l-w.ca> wrote:My guess is the VCC isn't implementing DIVQ
>>> correctly, probably by not providing the remainder unless regular integer
>>> division is also failing.--Coco mailing listCoco at maltedmedia.comhttps://
>>> pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco-- Coco mailing
>>> listCoco at maltedmedia.comhttps://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Coco mailing list
>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>