[Coco] Basic09 6309 version

[Wayne Campbell]

I put the 6809 version of B09 in the CMDS directory and ran a copy of the
JD procedure with no FLOAT() functions. It ran without errors and no
Hitting DIVQ_X error in VCC.


On May 25, 2017 2:17 AM, "Bill Pierce via Coco" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
wrote:

> I did a search through the nitros9 sources and only found 6 references to
> "divq". 2 were in asm and disasm which were only references for the
> programs asm/disasm functionality and no actual running code, 2 were in 2
> of Boisy's test routines in one of his folders (not used for anything), and
> the other 2 were in basic09 and runb. So they are the only 2 nitros9
> modules that would rare their ugly heads on this.
>
> I do remember some years ago when Joseph was developing VCC that there was
> some mention of something being missing in the 6309 core. I've searched but
> couldn't find where I saw it (it was loooong ago). I've even mentioned it
> in the issues on the VCC repo issues page. We may have found what it was.
>
>
>
>
>
> Bill Pierce
> "Charlie stole the handle, and the train it won't stop going, no way to
> slow down!" - Ian Anderson - Jethro Tull
>
> My Music from the Tandy/Radio Shack Color Computer 2 & 3
> https://sites.google.com/site/dabarnstudio/
> Co-Contributor, Co-Editor for CocoPedia
> http://www.cocopedia.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
>
> E-Mail: ooogalapasooo at aol.com
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Walter Zambotti <zambotti at iinet.net.au>
> To: 'CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts' <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> Sent: Thu, May 25, 2017 3:31 am
> Subject: Re: [Coco] Basic09 6309 version
>
> >This could explain the Hitting DIVQ_X error that VCC keeps complaining
> about.This error could be isolated to either VCC or BASIC09_6309.We can
> eliminate which one is the problem by running the BASIC09_6309 version on a
> real 6309 coco and not in VCC.  If the same problem persists then the
> problem in in BASIC09_6309.  If it does not persist then the problem is in
> VCC.I don't have a 6309 in my CoCo so I can't volunteer to help.Any takers
> out there?Walter-----Original Message-----From: Coco [mailto:coco-bounces@
> maltedmedia.com] On Behalf Of Wayne CampbellSent: Thursday, 25 May 2017
> 12:11 PMTo: CoCoList <coco at maltedmedia.com>Subject: Re: [Coco] Basic09
> 6309 versionThis could explain the Hitting DIVQ_X error that VCC keeps
> complaining about.On May 24, 2017 8:52 PM, "William Astle" <lost at l-w.ca>
> wrote:My guess is the VCC isn't implementing DIVQ correctly, probably by
> not providing the remainder unless regular integer division is also
> failing.--Coco mailing listCoco at maltedmedia.comhttps://
> pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco-- Coco mailing
> listCoco at maltedmedia.comhttps://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>