[Coco] Basic09 6309 version

[Walter Zambotti]

>This could explain the Hitting DIVQ_X error that VCC keeps complaining about.

This error could be isolated to either VCC or BASIC09_6309.

We can eliminate which one is the problem by running the BASIC09_6309 version on a real 6309 coco and not in VCC.  If the same problem persists then the problem in in BASIC09_6309.  If it does not persist then the problem is in VCC.

I don't have a 6309 in my CoCo so I can't volunteer to help.

Any takers out there?

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: Coco [mailto:coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com] On Behalf Of Wayne Campbell
Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2017 12:11 PM
To: CoCoList <coco at maltedmedia.com>
Subject: Re: [Coco] Basic09 6309 version

This could explain the Hitting DIVQ_X error that VCC keeps complaining about.

On May 24, 2017 8:52 PM, "William Astle" <lost at l-w.ca> wrote:


My guess is the VCC isn't implementing DIVQ correctly, probably by not providing the remainder unless regular integer division is also failing.

--
Coco mailing list
Coco at maltedmedia.com
https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco