[Coco] [COCO] Stacking the 6309?

[Zippster]

So for testing purposes.  That makes sense.

- Ed


> On Mar 31, 2017, at 5:28 AM, S Klammer <sklammer at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> For the same reason that most emulators allow you to choose and those
> emulators, although I use them, may not be 100%.   For example, you're
> writting some really funky code to take advantage of the legal 6309
> features, yet you want 6809 users to use the same program?
> 
> Shain
> On Mar 30, 2017 10:13 PM, "Zippster" <zippster278 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Yes, why?
>> 
>> You’ll never know it’s not a 6809 unless you run some really funky code
>> with illegal instructions.
>> 
>> -Ed
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 30, 2017, at 8:52 PM, Bruce W. Calkins <brucewcalkins at charter.net>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Since the 6309 normally works like a 6809, why bother?
>>> 
>>> Bruce W.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 03/30/2017 05:59 PM, S Klammer wrote:
>>>> A while back, we had some discussion about using a ZIF type socket to
>> allow
>>>> swapping back to a straight 6809.
>>>> 
>>>> Seems Chris Burke (of Burke & Burke) provided some instruction on just
>>>> stacking the 6309 on top of the existing 6809, along with a switch...
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.6809.org.uk/dragon/6309fit.shtml
>>>> 
>>>> Shain
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Coco mailing list
>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Coco mailing list
>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco