[Coco] Commodore 64. 1541 disk drive

[Arthur Flexser]

You are right about that.  The C64 floppy drive had a transfer rate that
was actually slower than that achievable with CoCo CASSETTES!  (Though of
course having direct access to a file via a directory is far superior to
using cassette.)

Art


On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Henry Rietveld <rietveldh at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> I would definitely have preferred tandy drives. But the price was right.
> And in cnd$ that was actually $3 usd
>
> Sent from my  Passport SE smartphone
>   Original Message
> From: piperfox74
> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 7:44 PM
> To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts
> Reply To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts
> Subject: Re: [Coco] Commodore 64. 1541 disk drive
>
>
> That’s OS-9! With a *hyphen*, you Unbeliever!!!! ;-)
>
> And besides, I’ve always heard the 1541 (and the C64 floppy drive
> interface in general) described as painfully slow. So there.
>
>
> > On Dec 13, 2016, at 19:41, RETRO Innovations <go4retro at go4retro.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > hehe, I could probably whip you up an adapter :-)
> >
> > But, you could only read/write Commodore formatted disks :-)
> >
> > Still, wouldn't that be a weird thing to see...
> >
> > Not to get into a flame war, but it is a shame the Tandy Coco machines
> did not have an intelligent drive like the 1541.  That foresight from Chuck
> Peddle allows the drive medium and format to be largely independent of the
> machine.  Adding multi-gigabyte drives to the CBM platform is trivial
> compared to the sector/offset/etc. work and DOS changes needed on the Coco
> platform.
> >
> > I know, I know, the Coco has the 6809, and OS/9, I'll go away now.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > --
> > Coco mailing list
> > Coco at maltedmedia.com
> > https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>