[Coco] Multi Pack Replacement

[Mark McDougall]

On 24/02/2015 11:33 AM, James C. Hrubik wrote:

> Frankly, I’m flabbergasted.  Anybody who thinks that a commercially
> dead computer system is going to be the basis for commercially viable
> spin-offs must either be on some other planet or smoking too much dope.

I think we've found the new 'Coco4 discussion' iteration to pop up on the 
mailing list every 4 months! ;)

FWIW I would consider any Coco-related development that I may undertake to 
be 'cost neutral' if I recovered the manufacturing/postage costs. I wouldn't 
ever dare dream that even a fraction of the engineering costs could be 
recouped! That's why it's called a hobby.

Regards,

-- 
|              Mark McDougall                | "Electrical Engineers do it
|  <http://members.iinet.net.au/~msmcdoug>   |   with less resistance!"