[Coco] Someone's next hardware project: WiFi

Aaron Wolfe aawolfe at gmail.com
Tue Nov 18 19:17:44 EST 2014


Is this case, the module itself implements tcpip.  The coco would talk to
it very much like it was just a modem, via serial and it even uses AT
commands.  Its similar in many ways to the tcpip functionality in
DriveWire, but you don't need a second computer.  You could also use it to
talk to a DriveWire server for disk services.
 On Nov 18, 2014 7:09 PM, "Salvador Garcia" <ssalvadorgarcia at netscape.net>
wrote:

> This Wifi module is one of many.
>
> My question (more to myself and the original poster, plus any one else
> that wishes to discuss it) is the following: What is the objective of
> getting a Wifi module to work with the CoCo?
>
> I don't believe it is that difficult to interface the module with the
> computer, but connecting the CoCo to a Wifi network is one thing. It is an
> entirely different thing to have it communicate with other devices on the
> network. A protocol needs to be used (most likely TCP/IP) and a driver
> developed, plus the application that will make use of it.
>
> There can be legitimate uses for a WiFi network adapter for the CoCo, and
> any reason just because it is there, but if, for example, the objective is
> to eliminate the cable then perhaps a wireless serial connection  (as in
> rs232) might also be an interesting option. Salvador
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tormod Volden <lists.tormod at gmail.com>
> To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> Sent: Sat, Nov 15, 2014 6:00 am
> Subject: Re: [Coco] Someone's next hardware project: WiFi
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:10 PM, tim lindner wrote:
> > I've mentioned this before, but now there is a new article about this
> > tiny/cheap "System-On-A-Chip" WiFi module.
> >
> > Is it OK to beg some hardware guy to connect this up to a CoCo?>
> > http://www.epanorama.net/newepa/2014/11/09/wifi-module-esp8266-for-iot/
> >
>
> I have one of these that will be connected to my Dragon, but through a
> microcontroller as part of a larger project. The idea is that the
> microcontroller "talks" DriveWire, and the wireless modem can be
> addressed through a DriveWire virtual serial channel. Although a bit
> more indirect, this method fits nicely into existing software
> infrastructure, and the Dragon/CoCo doesn't have to be stuck listening
> to the bit-banger.
>
> It would maybe be possible to connect the wifi modem directly to the
> bit-banger port also (with adequate voltage level conversion), but I
> would think something like an UART like Gene mentions would be better.
>
> Yes, the module does WPA2.
>
> Tormod
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>


More information about the Coco mailing list