[Coco] CoCo 3 I/O map

John W. Linville linville at tuxdriver.com
Fri Mar 7 14:56:23 EST 2014


On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:23:52PM -0700, Willard Goosey wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 03:25:10AM -0500, Arthur Flexser wrote:
> > Certainly, the SmartWatch would be addressed at $C000 if it was piggybacked
> > on the Disk ROM, or contained in a standard cartridge.  The Burke and Burke
> > version was addressed at $FF50.  I don't know of any version addressed at
> > $FFC0.  If there was one, it would use 4 bytes ($FFC0-FFC3), not 5.
> 
> OK there's one that's not on my list, where was the B&B COCOXT addressed?

That seems to be $ff50-$ff5f, according to "Burke & Burke App. Note
1 December 3, 1987".

-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville at tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.



More information about the Coco mailing list