[Coco] One Liner Contest

[Aaron Wolfe]

BTW... Speaking of fantastic prizes.. Folks have really stepped up to
reward the contest entrants!

The current list of prizes is now available on the contest website:

http://cococoding.com/contest/

(under Sponsors)

We will still accept donations to be given to the contestants, of
course.  (and the One liner prize(s) will be separate.. and you can
donate to those too)

-Aaron


On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Aaron Wolfe <aawolfe at gmail.com> wrote:
> I will award a winner (and a fantastic prize!) for both *if* we have
> at least 3 entries for both kinds.  Otherwise its a free for all :)
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Arthur Flexser <flexser at fiu.edu> wrote:
>> Maybe have a "one-line" and "two-line" division of the contest?  Though it
>> should count as one line if the second consists only of 20 GOTO20.
>>
>> Art
>> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Aaron Banerjee <spam_proof at verizon.net>wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to see if anyone can write a "one liner" (or "two liner") BASIC
>>> program that doesn't call ML subroutines, etc, that can actually generate
>>> an ?ST ERROR by actually having a string formula that is too complex.  I've
>>> never been able to do it without "cheating."  I'll see what I can do for
>>> chipping in on the prize if someone can...
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 7, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
>>>
>>>  On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Allen Huffman <alsplace at pobox.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 7, 2013, at 2:06 PM, Luis Antoniosi (CoCoDemus) <
>>>>> retrocanada76 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ok no machine code poke, but pokes on video like poke &h400,x are allowed
>>>>>> right ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I suppose they wanted it to be BASIC, not "short assembly contest" but
>>>>> I'd love to see a second category to whatever folks could do in one (or
>>>>> two?) lines -- asm or otherwise. Neat.
>>>>>
>>>>> How about it, Aaron? Traditional entry, then "anything goes as long as
>>>>> it fits and can be typed in" entry?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> It's certainly OK with me.  So long as it can be typed in and uses at
>>>> most two lines.. go for it!  Maybe we will see some entries that
>>>> couldn't qualify for the Rainbow restrictions :)
>>>>
>>>> -Aaron
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Coco mailing list
>>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>>> http://five.pairlist.net/**mailman/listinfo/coco<http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Coco mailing list
>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>> http://five.pairlist.net/**mailman/listinfo/coco<http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Coco mailing list
>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco