[Coco] And update on my Roger Taylor Drive Pak saga...
fwp at deepthought.com
Fri Jun 8 21:35:33 EDT 2012
I agree that Blake should be able to tell his story without worrying about saying something
critical about a protected person of the list. The only criteria should be that no vulgar
language be used, no name calling or other unneeded personal attacks and that the comments
are accurate. At one time or another most of us have disagreed, debated or even (gasp) argued
with each other.
That said I think that it's important to remember that over the years Roger has done a lot for the
The Other Frank
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 08:31:33PM -0400, Randall.kindig wrote:
> I disagree. The guy was objectively telling his story. I'd be upset in his shoes too.
> On Jun 8, 2012, at 7:30 PM, "Stephen H. Fischer" <SFischer1 at Mindspring.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > My vote is to ban "Blake Patterson" from the CoCo list forever.
> > Kicking someone when he is down repeatedly is just not done here or anywhere in the civilized world.
> > SHF
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Blake Patterson" <blakespot at gmail.com>
> > To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 2:56 PM
> > Subject: [Coco] And update on my Roger Taylor Drive Pak saga...
> >> Just posted an update, for those interested:
> >> http://www.bytecellar.com/2012/01/10/a-cautionary-tale-for-the-tandy-coco-community/
> >> bp
> >> --
> >> Coco mailing list
> >> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> >> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> > --
> > Coco mailing list
> > Coco at maltedmedia.com
> > http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
More information about the Coco