[Coco] CF and SD life expectancy
Mark Ormond
markormond at mtxsystems.com
Sun Jul 24 22:31:22 EDT 2011
Go raid 6 or zfs.
(Never trust raid as a way to keep your data safe. A good backup that is tested is the only way to insure your data is safe. I sell A LOT of servers,
And tell this to every customer. Raid is a good way to keep downtime to a minimum.)
Later,
dabone
-----Original Message-----
From: coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com [mailto:coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com] On Behalf Of Steven Hirsch
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 9:49 PM
To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts
Subject: Re: [Coco] CF and SD life expectancy
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Mark McDougall wrote:
> I have CDs burned less than 10 years ago that I can't read. I have DVDs
> burned less than 5 years ago that I can't read. I have a spindle of DVDs that
> I bought about 2 years ago that mostly won't burn at all.
Same here.
> I'd *never* trust any archival function to optical media atm. I'm really
> hanging on some sort of 100% reliable, permanent archival medium, because
> even backing up to two HDD still makes me nervous! :(
My favorite: LTO tape. Fast and incredibly reliable.
I'm not sure I even trust RAID 5 anymore. I recently had one drive in an
array fail on my Linux workstation, followed quickly by a second during
the rebuild! As the capacity of drives gets larger, the chances of this
happening increase. Fortunately, I had a recent tape backup and didn't
lose anything critical.
Steve
--
--
Coco mailing list
Coco at maltedmedia.com
http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
More information about the Coco
mailing list