[Coco] CF and SD life expectancy

Mark Ormond markormond at mtxsystems.com
Sun Jul 24 22:31:22 EDT 2011


Go raid 6 or zfs. 
(Never trust raid as a way to keep your data safe. A good backup that is tested is the only way to insure your data is safe. I sell A LOT of servers,
And tell this to every customer. Raid is a good way to keep downtime to a minimum.)

Later,
dabone

-----Original Message-----
From: coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com [mailto:coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com] On Behalf Of Steven Hirsch
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 9:49 PM
To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts
Subject: Re: [Coco] CF and SD life expectancy

On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Mark McDougall wrote:

> I have CDs burned less than 10 years ago that I can't read. I have DVDs 
> burned less than 5 years ago that I can't read. I have a spindle of DVDs that 
> I bought about 2 years ago that mostly won't burn at all.

Same here.

> I'd *never* trust any archival function to optical media atm. I'm really 
> hanging on some sort of 100% reliable, permanent archival medium, because 
> even backing up to two HDD still makes me nervous! :(

My favorite:  LTO tape.  Fast and incredibly reliable.

I'm not sure I even trust RAID 5 anymore.  I recently had one drive in an 
array fail on my Linux workstation, followed quickly by a second during 
the rebuild!  As the capacity of drives gets larger, the chances of this 
happening increase.  Fortunately, I had a recent tape backup and didn't 
lose anything critical.

Steve



-- 


--
Coco mailing list
Coco at maltedmedia.com
http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco



More information about the Coco mailing list