[Coco] Back, in the days ...
George Ramsower
georgeramsower at gmail.com
Sun Mar 23 18:11:56 EDT 2008
Ward Griffiths reminds me:
> From: "George Ramsower" <georgeramsower at gmail.com>
>> Reminiscing the old days, I remember when IBM came out with the PC with
>> 640K RAM. They said this was more memory than anyone would ever need.
>> A five meg hard drive was big enough for anything you could ever use.
>> A computer running a clock speed of sixteen megahertz was fast!....
>> Really
>> FAST!
>
> It was Bill Gates who said that 640k was as much as anybody would ever
> need. And the earliest stock hard drives for the PC/XT were ten meg.
>
I wasn't so sure. I THOUGHT it was IBM, so did some checking...Now I don't
think anyone ever said that.
"640K ought to be enough for anybody."
a.. Often attributed to Gates in 1981. Gates considered the IBM PC's 640kB
program memory a significant breakthrough over 8-bit systems that were
typically limited to 64kB, but he has denied making this remark.
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Bill_Gates
>> I'm sure some of you remember the Turbo mode. Wow!
>> The first hard drive for the coco was a five meg unit. It wasn't a
>> standard
>> SCSI interface, it was something a little different. Somewhere in my
>> arsenal
>> of my old documents, I have the schematic of that old controller. I
>> remember
>> it had very few chips.
>> I contacted Tandy (way back when) and they faxed me a copy of the
>> schematic. It was had drawn and not very pretty.
>
> No drive released or supported for the Color Computer by Tandy Corporation
> was anything remotely related to SCSI. They were all ST-506 using an
> adapter that made the CoCo end look like a Model 3/4 edge connector, with
> the actual hard disk controller in the first drive enclosure. The adapter
> connected to all of the same drives that attached to the Models 1/3/4 and
> 2/12/16/6000 (except for the early 8.4 Mb drives for the 2/16 which were
> crap 8" Shugart SASI devices) which ranged in capacity from five to
> seventy megabytes per drive (and four drives were supported, mix and match
> 5, 10, 12, 15, 35 or 70 MB drives -- only the first had the controller, a
> WD-1010 that supported up to four heads and 1024 cylinders per unit).
Someone told me once that the SASI interface was a downscaled SCSI and the
coco controller was even more hacked. Memory may be bad on that. I knew the
drive itself need an adapter. My first hard drive was an MFM drive, a SCSI
controller and a SCSI interface card on the coco... the same card I'm still
using today
>
> The first drives officially supported for the CoCo were 10 Meg. The 5 Meg
> drives were ancient history before the first official Tandy CoCo HD
> adapter, though if you had one it worked fine.
Bit rot in the brain again.
> --
> Ward Griffiths
More information about the Coco
mailing list