[Coco] ReactOS...

[Ryan Pritchard]

As far as I have read in this mailing list, the specifications of the  
DriveWire protocol are available on the Cloud-9 website, and if I  
understand from the Cloud-9 site, and the postings in this list, we  
are free to develop DriveWire servers for whatever OS we want.  It is  
the client that is what is kept locked up a little and I respect that,  
since not everyone has a Windows or Mac computer, which I believe are  
the two server platforms supported out of Cloud-9.

Regards,

Ryan Pritchard
Fun Extends All Basic Life Expectancies



On 15-Dec-08, at 1:46 AM, Michael Robinson wrote:

>
> On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 01:34 -0600, Sean wrote:
>> I wish BeOS would have made it. That was a neat one 10 years ago.   
>> Ran
>> the Intel demo version, never had the money to invest in a BeBox.
>> Personally I would have called it the spiritual sucessor to the CoCo.
>> (for one, just because not enough people loved it. :)
>> It's multitasking could run circles around Windows at the time: 3D
>> demos, while playing multiple video and audio files at the same time.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BeOS_R5
>>
>> The demo would run well on a Pentium or PII system, with a standard
>> VGA card, and sound most likely through older Soundblaster cards.
>> http://www.bebits.com/app/2680
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Mike Pepe <lamune at doki-doki.net>  
>> wrote:
>>>
> Well. ReactOS isn't BeOS but if it stabilizes it could potentially
> perform better than MS Windows.  I'd just like to see drivewire
> server run on it.  The specs for ReactOS are lower than Linux,
> which is not saying much considering how unstable it is right
> now.
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco