[Coco] The Definitive Post on the CC-Five ;)

[jdaggett at gate.net]

Then GI did not change the instructin set but only uniquely ID the part with their 
software in the ROM. 

james

On 29 Jan 2007 at 9:51, Mark McDougall wrote:

> jdaggett at gate.net wrote:
> 
> > So it may not be all that beneficial to extract teh code within the
> > processor because of the potential of teh instruction set being
> > non-standard TI instructionset. It is an 8 bit processor that has
> > 0/2K/4K internal ROM (TMS7000,  TMS7020, TMS7040).
> > 
> > In my opinion not worth trying to grab the code and decipher what
> > makes it up. Better to start new with a HC11/HC12 or an AVR. 
> 
> So I'm guessing you haven't seen this? ...
> <http://tlindner.macmess.org/?page_id=96>
> 
> Tim includes a fully commented disassembly of the PIC7040 ROM... (I'm
> yet to look at it myself I must admit)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- 
> |              Mark McDougall                | "Electrical Engineers
> do it |  <http://members.iinet.net.au/~msmcdoug>   |   with less
> resistance!"
> 
> -- 
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.12/655 - Release Date:
> 1/28/2007 1:12 PM
>