[Coco] ?PEEK(&HFF90) RETURNS 126 ON MY UNUPGRADED 26-3124?

[Robert Gault]

coco at yourdvd.net wrote:
> Marks test of ?peek(&hff90) returns 255 on all of my 3024 multi-paks,
> however it returned 126 on my 3124. I opened the 3124 and there is no
> satellite board nor any piggy backed chips nor any mod of any kind - i
> can't see that this pak has been upgraded. Does this test only work for
> the 3024's? thanks - Rob
> 
> p.s. - Mark - has my paypal payment cleared for the pal chip 3024
> upgrade? thanks - robert
> 
> 

Many of the GIME addresses can't be read. $FF90 returns non-usable 
results which is why both Basic and OS-9 keep images of values sent to 
this address rather than trying to read it.