[Coco] Re: S-Record test

Roger Taylor roger at newfoal.com
Sat Jan 7 12:03:13 EST 2006


At 09:47 AM 1/7/2006, you wrote:
>All the checksums are wrong. The checksum needs to include the length of 
>the line as well as all of the character pairs. So for the first line, A4 
>should be 91; NOT(A4)=5b, 5b+13=6e, and NOT(6e)=91
>
>Once you correct all the checksums, you can just declare the file is a 
>.rom or .ccc and test it in MESS.
>
>Rog


I wonder if the S0 record is required, the header record containing the 
module name, etc.?
In other words, would some EPROM burners refuse the file if S0 is not present?



-- 
Roger Taylor




More information about the Coco mailing list