[Coco] [Rainbow on Disc] scanned vs. camera

Benoit Bleau benbleau at gmail.com
Fri Apr 28 17:16:33 EDT 2006


Option #2 is my favorite, but I would take #1 if it's how the ROD is 
distributed.

-Benoit

Michael Wayne Harwood wrote:
> Anyone who is planning on getting a copy of the "Rainbow on Disc" please
> tell me the following:
>
> 1. The "camera" version is just fine - do that so that I can get it ASAP
> 2. The "scanned" version is my preference, and I will wait to get that.
> 3. I want both - give me the "camera" version ASAP and I will pay the
> license fees a second time to get the "scanned" version when available.
>
> Regards,
> Michael Harwood
>
>   
>> Can we revisit this one more time?  I have posted 2 .djvu files for a true
>> apples to apples comparison - both files are 1.6mb is size and of the
>> exact same 10 pages of the August 1989 issue.  These files have not been
>> OCR'd.
>>
>> The purpose of this comparison is to look at two files that use different
>> sources for image capture of the Rainbow magazine pages and determine
>> whether the images gathered via the camera are "good enough" or whether
>> the wait for the rest of the images to be scanned is worth the effort.
>> Please focus your attention on image quality.
>>
>> The .djvu files are as follows:
>>
>> http://www.musicheadproductions.org/downloads/camera.djvu
>> http://www.musicheadproductions.org/downloads/scanned.djvu
>>
>> Regards,
>> Michael Harwood
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Coco mailing list
>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>
>>     
>
>
> "The best place to be is here,
>  the best time to be is now."
>              -- Bill and Ted
>
>
>   




More information about the Coco mailing list