[Coco] cc6809 project

jdaggett at gate.net jdaggett at gate.net
Tue Mar 22 21:50:57 EST 2005


Boisy

I concurr that all in one assemblers are nice if y ou are working on 
multiple processors. For the COCO at least now is but basically two.

What do you mean be "modern Assembly format"?


james


On 22 Mar 2005 at 15:36, Boisy G. Pitre wrote:

From:           	"Boisy G. Pitre" <boisy at boisypitre.com>
Subject:        	Re: [Coco] cc6809 project
Date sent:      	Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:36:00 -0600
To:             	jhoger at pobox.com,
	CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts 
<coco at maltedmedia.com>
Copies to:      	Send reply to:  	CoCoList for Color Computer 
Enthusiasts <coco at maltedmedia.com>
	<mailto:coco-
request at maltedmedia.com?subject=unsubscribe>
	<mailto:coco-
request at maltedmedia.com?subject=subscribe>

> Ideally we need to move away from "all in one" assemblers like mamou,
> to an assembler/linker toolkit much like rma/rlink.  However, modern
> assembly source code is formatted quite differently from the way
> Motorola/Microware assembly was from yesteryear.  My goal is to move
> the NitrOS-9 project to this new assembler format once the tools are
> fully tested and working.





More information about the Coco mailing list