[Coco] cc6809 project
jdaggett at gate.net
jdaggett at gate.net
Tue Mar 22 21:50:57 EST 2005
Boisy
I concurr that all in one assemblers are nice if y ou are working on
multiple processors. For the COCO at least now is but basically two.
What do you mean be "modern Assembly format"?
james
On 22 Mar 2005 at 15:36, Boisy G. Pitre wrote:
From: "Boisy G. Pitre" <boisy at boisypitre.com>
Subject: Re: [Coco] cc6809 project
Date sent: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:36:00 -0600
To: jhoger at pobox.com,
CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts
<coco at maltedmedia.com>
Copies to: Send reply to: CoCoList for Color Computer
Enthusiasts <coco at maltedmedia.com>
<mailto:coco-
request at maltedmedia.com?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:coco-
request at maltedmedia.com?subject=subscribe>
> Ideally we need to move away from "all in one" assemblers like mamou,
> to an assembler/linker toolkit much like rma/rlink. However, modern
> assembly source code is formatted quite differently from the way
> Motorola/Microware assembly was from yesteryear. My goal is to move
> the NitrOS-9 project to this new assembler format once the tools are
> fully tested and working.
More information about the Coco
mailing list