[Coco] Re: Any reason to put a 6309 in a Coco2?

[Roger Taylor]

At 10:47 PM 1/1/2004 -1000, you wrote:
>On Jan 1, 2004, at 9:32 PM, Roger Taylor wrote:
>
>>The "page switch" codes listed makes no sense to me at all.  I think a 
>>disassembler would benefit by knowing those extra codes.  They seem to be 
>>just mainly the standard opcodes + 1.
>
>I think he is talking about instruction page switches XX being page 1, 
>10XX page 2, and 11XX page 3.

Ah.  Also, the opcode+1 dupes should be put into any current disassemblers 
if they're not already, to help get rid of those bad opcode reports here 
and there.  Ofcourse, reassembling the disassembler's listing would fix things.



----------
Roger Taylor