[Coco] NitrOS9 and 6309 code
Robert Gault
robert.gault at att.net
Sat Jun 1 22:12:43 EDT 2019
Curtis,
You are correct! My system is using Shellplus as are the nightly builds so they're vulnerable to the
234 error.
I did a search (which is easy on a Windows system) for any command or module that contains E$NEMod
(error 234) and it is just Shellplus and fchain.
Since fchain seems OK, I checked and found in Shellplus
L1413 cmpa #$11
lbne L14D7
leax >u00E3,u
stx <u0010
lbra L15D7
L14A3 cmpa #Prgrm+Objct ML program?
lbeq L15D7 Yes, skip ahead
cmpa #Data Is it a data module?
bne L14D7 No, skip ahead
* Not 6809 object code or data module either
L14D7 sty <u000A Save data area size
leax >L0013,pc Point to alternate languages table
L14DE tst ,x Is this entry active?
lbeq L1629 No, exit with non-existing module error
There may be other similar code. Also Shellplus has no IFNE H6309 so there is no 6309 code obvious
spot to patch.
With a very cursory examination, it looks like L1413 and L14A3 are the locations to patch with
checks for Obj6309 so:
L1413 cmpa #$11
beq L1413b
cmpa #$17
lbne L14D7
L1413b leax >u00E3,u
L14A3 cmpa #Prgrm+Objct
lbeq L15D7
cmpa #Prgrm+Obj6309
lbeq L15D7
cmpa #Data
Robert
L. Curtis Boyle wrote:
> As I stated earlier - I suspect Shellplus might be the culprit, as it does check to see what type of module it is, in case it needs a ???primary??? module to execute (like RUNB). I don???t think it has ever been patched to handle Obj6309.
> I will look into that later this weekend.
>
>
> L. Curtis Boyle
> curtisboyle at sasktel.net
>
><snip>
More information about the Coco
mailing list