[Coco] NitrOS9 and 6309 code

[Allen Huffman]

On May 31, 2019, at 10:52 PM, L. Curtis Boyle <curtisboyle at sasktel.net> wrote:
> 
> It still think “Bad Module” should be reserved for a damaged module (bad length, CRC, Header parity, etc.) vs. for wrong CPU. This would make it easier for beginners to know whether they have accidentally mixed a perfectly good 6309 module on a 6809 system, vs. trying to figure out if a module has gotten corrupted.
> 
> My thoughts, anyways.

Does 6809 not have a Bad CRC error already? I later OS-9, Bad Module is returned when you try to load a perfectly good binary that is from the wrong version of OS-9, or a PC executable ;)