[Coco] Generic Hardware Pak
Michael Brant
brant.michael.l at gmail.com
Thu May 31 18:46:02 EDT 2018
The two board approach seems interesting. although with your extender have
cart slots that are horizontal instead of vertical makes for some more room
in a cart.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:13 PM, RETRO Innovations <go4retro at go4retro.com>
wrote:
> On 3/14/2018 11:57 AM, Allen Huffman wrote:
>
>> That plugged in some large Arduino, didn’t it? Then you could use Shields.
>>
> It plugged into an Arduino MEGA, and shields could then be placed on the
> unit.
>
>>
>> Tho I suppose it could just be the “$5 Arduino” with the chip and a few
>> support components, then run signals out to a header of some kind and be
>> all in one. Not sure how that would be programmed tho without a ttl adapter.
>>
> In theory, you are correct, and others have suggested the same.
>
> Concerns:
>
> * Arduino boards have fallen in price quite significantly. Though it
> would be trivial to add the ATMEGA168 (I have 1000 in stock here) to
> the board, programming would require a USB-capable device, which
> drives up the price. With boards at $8.00, it is incredibly hard to
> design in the Arduino functionality under the same cost structure.
> o As well, designing in the Arduino functionality forces the
> design author to support Arduino functionality, which is not
> trivial.
> * There are many Arduino (and Arduino-like) boards, so targeting one
> speccific uC limits options. Just within the Arduino space, if you
> target the ATMEGA128, someone will want the 328, while others will
> need the MEGA1280/2560 space. That does not include the ARM or
> Intel options.
> * The "shield" layout is well understood and well supported. If one
> ignore the layout and spacing, it adds more work to those hoping to
> simply buy and install a shield. I think one ignores that specific
> layout with the high risk that Coco enthusiasts will be
> significantly less interested in the product.
> o Thus, if support for the Arduino "shield" layout is required,
> this sets the size of the board, as the shield pins must be
> accessible with the unit installed in an MPI or in the Coco.
> * An all-in-one option forces the user to connect individual wires to
> a board that might be installed in the Coco or the MPI, forcing
> significant clutter. A two board approach allows the option of
> relocating the Arduino via a common ribbon cable to an alternate
> location, where wiring is not as much a concern.
>
> Jim
>
> --
> RETRO Innovations, Contemporary Gear for Classic Systems
> www.go4retro.com
> store.go4retro.com
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
More information about the Coco
mailing list