[Coco] Generic Hardware Pak

Michael Brant brant.michael.l at gmail.com
Thu May 31 18:46:02 EDT 2018


The two board approach seems interesting. although with your extender have
cart slots that are horizontal instead of vertical makes for some more room
in a cart.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:13 PM, RETRO Innovations <go4retro at go4retro.com>
wrote:

> On 3/14/2018 11:57 AM, Allen Huffman wrote:
>
>> That plugged in some large Arduino, didn’t it? Then you could use Shields.
>>
> It plugged into an Arduino MEGA, and shields could then be placed on the
> unit.
>
>>
>> Tho I suppose it could just be the “$5 Arduino” with the chip and a few
>> support components, then run signals out to a header of some kind and be
>> all in one. Not sure how that would be programmed tho without a ttl adapter.
>>
> In theory, you are correct, and others have suggested the same.
>
> Concerns:
>
>  * Arduino boards have fallen in price quite significantly. Though it
>    would be trivial to add the ATMEGA168 (I have 1000 in stock here) to
>    the board, programming would require a USB-capable device, which
>    drives up the price.  With boards at $8.00, it is incredibly hard to
>    design in the Arduino functionality under the same cost structure.
>      o As well, designing in the Arduino functionality forces the
>        design author to support Arduino functionality, which is not
>        trivial.
>  * There are many Arduino (and Arduino-like) boards, so targeting one
>    speccific uC limits options.  Just within the Arduino space, if you
>    target the ATMEGA128, someone will want the 328, while others will
>    need the MEGA1280/2560 space.  That does not include the ARM or
>    Intel options.
>  * The "shield" layout is well understood and well supported.  If one
>    ignore the layout and spacing, it adds more work to those hoping to
>    simply buy and install a shield. I think one ignores that specific
>    layout with the high risk that Coco enthusiasts will be
>    significantly less interested in the product.
>      o Thus, if support for the Arduino "shield" layout is required,
>        this sets the size of the board, as the shield pins must be
>        accessible with the unit installed in an MPI or in the Coco.
>  * An all-in-one option forces the user to connect individual wires to
>    a board that might be installed in the Coco or the MPI, forcing
>    significant clutter.  A two board approach allows the option of
>    relocating the Arduino via a common ribbon cable to an alternate
>    location, where wiring is not as much a concern.
>
> Jim
>
> --
> RETRO Innovations, Contemporary Gear for Classic Systems
> www.go4retro.com
> store.go4retro.com
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>


More information about the Coco mailing list