[Coco] Syscall
Stephen Fischer
SFischer1 at Mindspring.com
Sat Mar 3 20:07:45 EST 2018
Pardon my faulty brain, but my memory says that if you do not pack your
procedure than runb is not needed, Basic09 can run your procedure just fine.
Or if you do pack your procedure than Basic09 is not needed.
SHF
On 3/3/2018 4:52 PM, phil pt wrote:
> The file byte size is only 8699
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 10:01 PM, Wayne Campbell <asa.rand at gmail.com> wrote:
> can execute it just fine
>> I run into this problem a lot. What's happening, is that basic09 is trying
>> to load all of the parts that are merged together into the workspace at the
>> same time and it's not working. The best way to deal with this issue is to
>> make sure that you have enough space available in the workspace and load
>> syscall by itself into memory before running your program. This is not the
>> best way to deal with these things but at this point it's the only way I
>> found to deal with it while working in basic09. Perhaps Curtis or someone
>> else can provide a better way.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018, 5:58 PM phil pt <ptaylor2446 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am getting error 43 while trying to call syscall in my basic09 code. I
>>> have the correct type and runb and syscall merge.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Coco mailing list
>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Coco mailing list
>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>
>
More information about the Coco
mailing list